Diana Bond writing again on behalf of my client James Frederick Jensen, this time addressing my blog #1 to Chuck Bailey, a senior partner at Bailey and Wyant PLLC.
First our readers need to know that Chuck Wyant has attempted to contact James directly, saying, "We need to talk." We have verified that the e-overture came from a Bailey and Wyant account. Second, if it is not already clear, we want to underscore that nothing is off the record with respect to our case against another Bailey and Wyant partner, namely, Robert P. Martin. James Jensen is prepared to talk with Chuck, but openly and through a blog medium. So to start a transparent dialogue we are asking a few questions. Chuck Bailey: What do you want to talk about?Why have you contacted James at this juncture when he has in the past asked you on numerous occasions to address the harmful actions of Robert P Martin?Is it because Robert P Martin has become more of a liability than an assert to your firm? Why have you contacted James now after your firm has enlisted the aid of a very aggressive SEO company to combat our online program, one that seeks to reveal the truth about Robert P. Martin?Your recent online counteractions include 400 attempts to take down our blog posts, having succeeded in only two instances. At the same time James' personal sites were hacked to closure. Is this really a co-incidence? And, then why, so shortly after assuming the most aggressive to-date cyber battle position, has Chuck Bailey made this secret overture to James?
No comments:
Post a Comment